Monday, March 17, 2014

A630.9.4.RB_PALUGODCAROLYN



          After watching Schmidt’s video, I do feel that the Google Culture makes sense and that the building blocks for a culture that inspires effectiveness, efficiency and success are the employees.  Therefore, it all has to start at the hiring process.  Schmidt makes a very valid point when he says “you need to develop a culture where people actually are going to do what they’re going to do” (McKinsey&Company, 2011).  Google is successful because they hire the brightest talent.  But Schmidt also explains that they are passionate about what they do, enjoy their jobs and feel that this is a long-term fit.  Schmidt also mentions that one of the most important elements when recruiting is to look for compatibility.  I think the key here is not that everyone will be the same, because he mentions that discord is important so a company can evolve and make good business decisions.  But members have to be team players.  Also, Brown explains in his book that employees have to feel as part of the company, this creates ownership.  It not only matters that you hire the right kind of people, but you know how to retain them (Brown, 2011). 

            I think the business model that Google uses in regards to their hiring, as well as how they manage their employees (which is a kind of hands-off management), can be tricky and does take courage.  In essence, you are trusting your employees that they are going to do what they said they were going to do.  You have faith in their passion for their work and for the company.  That is why it is essential to start at the hiring process.  For example, at my husband’s company this model would be impossible.  First of all, there is a lot of favoritism and a lot of internal hiring of family members.  Members of the company have no loyalty to the company and only go to collect a paycheck.  They don’t necessarily feel passionate about their jobs and see it as a means to an end.  I don’t think the Google model would work for certain industries.  I suspect that it would not work for most unskilled workers who learned to do their jobs not because of passion but because of necessity.  

            At my office and my company, most of us from my experience, love what we do.  Interestingly enough, our offices have a high turn-over rate.  Not because people are unhappy, but because of the nature of the military life.  Most of our hires are dependent spouses who have to leave their positions because their military spouses are being sent to another destination.  Also, we work in small communities so everyone knows everyone and we get great satisfaction in helping people.  In my opinion, the Google culture is a bit of an anomaly.  I can imagine it working for smaller companies but am still fascinated by how it functions with a company with such a large employee-base.

            I think that the culture that Schmidt describes in his video takes a very special type of leader and very distinctive types of employees.  It only takes one “bad apple” to rock the boat, and if leadership is not careful, this one person can end up tipping the scales.  Although I admire what Google has been able to achieve in regards to its culture, I don’t see its realistic application in the real world so easily.  I think it is the kind of culture that has to be constantly nurtured, observed, and tweaked in order to survive.

References


No comments:

Post a Comment